Smart wearables that collect vital data, such as fitness trackers, smartwatches, and medical-grade health monitors, are becoming more and more popular in the marketplace. They are, for the vast majority, made in China. As they start to be produced in very large numbers, they are following the model of other mass-market electronic products, and buyers need to be aware of the implications of that model before starting their fitness wearable development project.
How Fitness Wearable Development and Manufacturing Work in China
Not many people know how wearable technology manufacturing (and other electronics such as smartphones and laptops) is organized in China.
Some companies do the R&D, designing the PCB, writing the firmware, and selecting components, and then sell the whole solution as “kits” to other companies. Let’s call them the R&D companies.
Those other companies buy the kits, then assemble and test the final products. We’ll call them the assemblers.
Assemblers do not:
- Have access to the source code.
- Decide what key components to use.
- Control the sensor integration.
All of these decisions are made by the R&D company.
So, when you get in touch with a manufacturer of a smartwatch, chances are, all they can do is offer relatively light customization. The software may have a slightly different feel. Maybe the casing will have a different shape. But it usually doesn’t go much deeper than that.
The distinction between R&D companies and assemblers is important when developing a new electronic product, as the company assembling the device may not have the engineering capabilities or design ownership needed for further development.
Fitness Wearable Customization Challenges
When made in China outside of big brands like Apple or Huawei, these products tend to be low-cost with intense competition between assemblers, and very little differentiation.
Any of the models will often look like many others that are made from the same kit. A kit typically includes:
- The electronic design and components.
- The firmware is loaded on the motherboard.
- Key peripherals like display, memory, and ports.
All these elements have been tested to work together. Customizations are possible, but they require additional payment, which goes mostly to the R&D company. Typically, you pay the assembler, who then pays the R&D company.
A real-world customization example
A German company orders a smartwatch with slight customization. They pay an assembler in Shenzhen who is using a kit from a Shenzhen R&D company. The assembler doesn’t have the source code or own the IP, and simply passes on requests (and payments) to the R&D company. In the end, the German company cannot get the source code, bill of materials, or key technical data, even if they forced the assembler to share everything they had.
This is why protecting your intellectual property through appropriate manufacturing and development agreements is so important when working with Chinese electronics suppliers.
Sensor Data Access: A Major Fitness Wearable Development Challenge
If you are developing a medical device or fitness wearable and want to build your own intellectual property, you need raw biometric data from the device’s sensors.
Look at the Apple Watch health functions:
- Blood oxygen
- ECG
- High/low heart rate notifications
- Irregular rhythm notifications
- Low cardio fitness notifications
- Sleep apnea notifications
All these rely on raw sensor data, which is then processed through a proprietary algorithm. To compete, you must create your own formulas, tuned for your niche application.
Access to sensor data is only one challenge. Developers also need to address reliability issues in smart wearables, including battery performance, water and sweat ingress, and the durability of miniature components.
Without raw data, you can’t…
- You can’t develop your own analytics.
- You can’t run population-level data analysis.
- You won’t have a strong IP to attract investors.
- You may not be able to meet medical device certification requirements.
As noted earlier, assemblers do not have the raw data because they don’t have access to the source code.
Why Chinese Wearable Manufacturers May Restrict Raw Sensor Data
In our experience, only a small minority of companies will provide raw data.
Why?
- IP protection – Raw data access could lead to reverse engineering of their algorithms.
- Performance concerns – If raw data is compared to certified medical devices or even an Apple Watch, discrepancies might be exposed.
- Business model – R&D companies want to keep customers dependent on their integrated solutions.
Beyond negotiating data access, developers should also consider how to protect their firmware during manufacturing, particularly when proprietary algorithms are a key part of their product’s value.
By only providing processed or calculated values, they avoid scrutiny.
7 Questions to Ask Before Choosing a Fitness Wearable Manufacturer
- Who actually owns the electronic design, firmware, and sensor integration?
- Will we have access to raw sensor data, rather than only processed readings?
- Can you provide the source code, API documentation, and complete bill of materials?
- Which features can genuinely be customized, and which are fixed by the underlying platform?
- Who owns the resulting product IP, tooling, and development deliverables?
- How will sensor accuracy, reliability, and product performance be validated?
- What happens if we need to switch manufacturers or develop our next product version independently?
How to Overcome Medical & Fitness Wearable Development Challenges
If you want to own your product and work based on an existing device, here’s what I recommend:
- Find and work directly with the R&D company.
- Negotiate raw data access upfront.
- Verify they can actually provide it (ask for sample data or API documentation).
- Lock IP rights into your contract.
The problem is that it’s quite difficult, and it often is impossible.
If you have time & funding, and if you want a device unique to your company, there is an alternative. Start the product design from scratch with your own team or a “work for hire” design firm. That’s how you have full flexibility, provided your design architecture and your development contracts allow for it.
A structured New Product Introduction (NPI) and quality assurance process can help identify technical and manufacturing risks before committing to mass production.
For a medical device in the EU or the USA, these steps are essential for achieving regulatory compliance.
You may also like…
- Health-Monitoring Smartwatch Case Study – A directly relevant project from our contract manufacturing subsidiary involving miniaturization, waterproofing, sensors, assembly, and production testing.
- Typical Reliability Issues in Smart Wearables – The reliability risks that designers and manufacturers should anticipate.
- OEM, ODM, Contract Manufacturers: Choose Your China Supplier Wisely – Particularly relevant to the article’s explanation of R&D companies versus assemblers.
- How to Achieve Firmware Protection in Manufacturing at Scale – Additional guidance about protecting product technology.
- 11 Questions When Sourcing Electronics Contract Manufacturers – Fitness wearable development and manufacturing challenges